🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying national guard in the Oregon city, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a previous decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the legal right and valid reason to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while city and state officials assert that local officers have command of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an protest bicycle event against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the initial injunction by mobilizing troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling shows that facts are important and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the legal representative in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”