‘Complete double standard’: Cigarette corporation lobbied against regulations in Africa which are law in UK

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid broader worries about industry interference with health policies. Last month, WHO officials issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.

Jonathan Nelson
Jonathan Nelson

A digital strategist with over a decade of experience in SEO and content marketing, passionate about data-driven growth.